Integration of Theory and Practice (ITP)

A circular maze representing various paths

The competencies for BCCI are laid out in a rubric. The rubric is a recent development and has been used to clarify what is needed in order to demonstrate competency. The process before this was less transparent and somewhat inconsistent. The current rubric is used to “mitigate cultural and religious misunderstandings, implicit bias, and systemic injustice.”[1] A Likert scale measures the applicant from: Does not demonstrate the competency, needs clarification, demonstrates competency, and exceeds competency.

Each measurement expounds on what information needs to be met to give a response that demonstrates the competency. Integration of Theory and Practice (ITP) is the first section of competencies. One study that surveyed over 700 board-certified chaplains notes that ITP was discussed more frequently as the most difficult out of the sections with one participant noting, “The ITP ones are often a stumbling block.”[2]

ITP 1

Articulate an approach to spiritual care rooted in one’s spiritual tradition and integrated with a theory of spiritual care.

ITP 2

Provides spiritual care that incorporates a working knowledge of the academic study of religion/spirituality.

ITP 3

Incorporate the spiritual and emotional dimensions of human development into one’s practice of care.

ITP 4

Incorporate a working knowledge of at least one ethical theory appropriate to one’s professional context.

ITP 5

Articulate a conceptual understanding of group dynamics and organizational behavior.

ITP 6

Articulate how primary research and research literature inform the profession of chaplaincy and one’s spiritual-care practice.

[1] Joel N. Berning, “A Rubric for Board Certified Chaplain Competencies.” Neshema: Association of Jewish Chaplains, last modified March 2, 2022, page 5, https://najc.org/wp-content/uploads/2023/07/BCC-Rubric-073023.pdf.

[2] Wendy Cadge, Ryan M. Combs, and Hallie R. Decker, “Board Certification of Professional Chaplains: A Qualitative Study of Stakeholder Perspectives,” Journal of Health Care Chaplaincy 28, no. 4 (2021): 453.